Millennials & Gen Z’s 20 LEAST Favorite Clothing Brands

We asked 1000 13-34-year-olds to tell us what their least favorite clothing brand is, and why…

It’s telling that when we ranked Millennials & Gen Z’s 20 favorite clothing brands last week, we still had to talk about the complete havoc that young consumers have been wreaking over the retail landscape. Wet Seal, The Limited, and American Apparel are just three recent examples of formerly shining youth brands forced to close down retail locations. These days brands are going to extremes—from major makeovers to business model reboots to experiencification—to attract them to stores. In short: the opinions of Millennials and Gen Z can make or break brands, and they’re doing everything they can to stay in their good graces.

We’ve been keeping track of their favorites for some time to keep tabs on the brands that are staying positive in their eyes. But this year, we also asked them to tell us what clothing brands they don’t like right now, and why. In a recent Ypulse monthly survey, we asked 1000 13-34-year-olds to answer the question, “What is your least favorite brand of clothing? Think of the name on the label.”* We’ve ranked their top 20 responses into an unliked list:

*These were open-end response questions to allow us to capture the full range of clothing brands that 13-34-year-olds consider their least favorites. As with any qualitative question, the responses include those that are top of mind and those that are least favored. The lists are ordered according to number of responses received, and alphabetically when ties occurred. 

What Are Their Least Favorite Clothing Brands?

13-34-year-olds

  1. Abercrombie & Fitch

  2. Forever21 (#6 on favorite list)

  3. Walmart

  4. Aeropostale (#14 on favorite list)

  5. Hollister

  6. Old Navy (#2 on favorite list)

  7. GAP (#7 on favorite…

 
 

Want to talk to us about the article
or dive into a custom study?


The Newsfeed

“I saw some heartbreaking stories in the internet, and decided to look up some international charities and donate to them.”—Male, 20, WA

Magazine covers aren’t dying in the age of digital—even when publications go out of print. Digital-only covers are “captur[ing] the print magazine's tangible essence” while building hype for media brands on social media (especially Instagram). PorterComplexNylonGQ and more publications have taken on the trend, featuring celebrities like Chance the Rapper to Sophie Turner. For magazines looking for a comeback with young consumers, digital-only covers can “translate their own brand for the web." (Fashionista)

Following “a series of scandals,” YouTube is taking major steps to overhaul its video review process and ad placement policies. The new guidelines “kick tens of thousands of video makers out” of the ad program by requiring anyone who generates ad revenue to produce 4,000 hours of content and gain 1,000 subscribers in one year, upping the ante from the previous requirement of 10,000 lifetime views. YouTube is also promising to manually review every video in its top tier of advertising (Google Preferred), and they’ve hired 10,000 new employees in the last year to get the job done. (recode)

Some Millennial parents are applying their minimalist tendencies to their kids’ toy chests to battle play clutter with “toy limitation.” It’s not a new concept—some schools of thought that have “advocate[d] simple, open-ended toys” include Montessori, Waldorf, and RIE—and today’s advocates say limiting toys can improve focus and happiness. A report from the University of Toledo concluded that toddlers “played ‘better’” when given fewer toys, meaning they played with each toy for longer and in more creative ways. However, some parents worry that they’re “denying [their children’s] self-expression” when they limit toys, and so the debate continues. (Slate)

Tostitos is giving fans their very own personalized Super Bowl ads to invite friends to their game parties. The platform takes a user's name, address, and other invite info and spins it into a video perfect for Customization Nation. Each ad features a different combination of Super Bowl clichés, including a “talking baby, puppies, sassy older women, [and] a celebrity pitchman.” Considering Ypulse data shows 64% of 13-34-year-olds watched some or all of the 2017 Super Bowl with friends and family, it’s a safe bet at least some will be sending out invites, possibly with some Tostitos product placement this year. (Adweek)

Facebook’s new feature lets Groups co-view each other’s content. “Watch Party” allows Group admins to show any Facebook video to members simultaneously, and to comment on a “dedicated reel” for a “shared viewing experience.” The feature is another step towards the platform’s new goal to “encourage meaningful social interactions,” and their new focus on Groups. The push for social viewing could possibly be integrated into other aspects of Facebook and its properties, like group chats. (TechCrunch)

“I plan to go to a free barre class at a local studio that is offering them as part of a New Year's promotion.”—Female, 33, MA

Sign Up Now

Subscribe for premium access to our content, data, and tools.

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

Upgrade Now

Upgrade for full access to the best marketing tools for understanding the next generation.

View our Client Case Studies