<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Loving The Jonas Brothers Says About Gen Y Girls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ypulse.com/what-loving-the-jonas-brothers-says-about-gen-y-girls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ypulse.com/what-loving-the-jonas-brothers-says-about-gen-y-girls</link>
	<description>Daily news and insight into the Millennial generation for media and marketing professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy2</title>
		<link>http://www.ypulse.com/what-loving-the-jonas-brothers-says-about-gen-y-girls/comment-page-1#comment-5001</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypulse.com/?p=9716#comment-5001</guid>
		<description>Great stuff. Yes, there is something there with a medium that has blown up huge and it&#039;s audience has outgrown them and have nowhere to go (so naturally they gravitate back).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff. Yes, there is something there with a medium that has blown up huge and it&#8217;s audience has outgrown them and have nowhere to go (so naturally they gravitate back).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Hummel</title>
		<link>http://www.ypulse.com/what-loving-the-jonas-brothers-says-about-gen-y-girls/comment-page-1#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Hummel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypulse.com/?p=9716#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>I think what you are seeing is a delaying of adulthood among Gen Y twentysomethings.  I don&#039;t see it as a bad thing, but because of our longer life spans, marrying later, and thus starting a family later, a twentysomethings&#039; life is much closer to a teen&#039;s than an adult with a family.  As a result it is very easy for 20 year olds to associate more with a TV show geared for a younger audience because in many ways they still see and identify themselves as kids.  

I&#039;m sure you have probably heard of it, but if not you should check out the book series Quarterlife Crisis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what you are seeing is a delaying of adulthood among Gen Y twentysomethings.  I don&#8217;t see it as a bad thing, but because of our longer life spans, marrying later, and thus starting a family later, a twentysomethings&#8217; life is much closer to a teen&#8217;s than an adult with a family.  As a result it is very easy for 20 year olds to associate more with a TV show geared for a younger audience because in many ways they still see and identify themselves as kids.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you have probably heard of it, but if not you should check out the book series Quarterlife Crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.ypulse.com/what-loving-the-jonas-brothers-says-about-gen-y-girls/comment-page-1#comment-4980</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypulse.com/?p=9716#comment-4980</guid>
		<description>I grew up with the Beatles. Literally I was in 9th grade when Meet the Beatles hit the U.S.  These guys were really, really young when you look at them as were the Bad Boys, the Rolling Stones.  So regarding the Jonas Brothers, they may be young but so were the Beatles to many young American women.  Girls of all ages, not just tweens, teens and college girls LOVED and I mean LOVED the Beatles-everyone had a favorite Beatle.  The only women I ever met who did not care for them-ever and usually ever-were our mothers who are now 80 to 90 years old.  

So i don&#039;t see the case for the Jonas Brothers-in fact one of them is &quot;older&quot;-

Regarding this year&#039;s graduates with the job market-when I graduated from college I was one of the few graduates who had a job-the 70&#039;s were not an easy time for people graduating from college between 1970 and actually 1979.  We were in Viet Nam and many of our male friends immediately went to the service after graduation from college.  Granted many of my friends got married-they did not have to look for a job then.  Myself-I decided to move to a ski resort as did many other college graduates that year and the next.  We had jobs and were introduced to more than alcohol or multiple partners.  

As females we were to be &quot;thin&quot; and beautiful.  This idea that the generation now is plagued with weight  issues and beauty.  Believe me, seldom did you ever see a girl between the age of 15 and 25 on a beach that did not have a hot body in the 70&#039;s.  There was no such thing as an overweight girl and definitely nothing like I see today on the beaches.  

We dressed in very high heels, very short skirts and our mothers were beyond themselves as were our fathers.  We stopped wearing bras after Glamour came out with the pencil test.  We wore make-up and looked just like models out of Glamour along with carrying Chanel bags.  Many of us looked like we stepped right out of Glamour, Mademoiselle or &quot;17&quot;.  There were tons of &quot;diet&quot; pills and we learned from our male friends who were wrestlers how to &quot;lose weight-&quot;  By the way-this was in the mid-West in Oklahoma.  Consider what it was like in S.CA., N.CA and the East Coast.  

What I am getting to is this-life changes but not as much as you think.  What has changed and is a real problem, a higher percentage of students using drugs and not realizing &quot;drugs kill&quot;-we did not know that &#039;Drugs kill&quot;-we even had doctors giving us scripts for painkillers and did not realize booze and pills don&#039;t mix until someone passed out from it.  Girls getting pregnant-nothing&#039;s really changed.  It&#039;s just more public now and many girls want to get pregnant.  What has changed is that Nancy Drew is no longer a book girls want to read and a sense of adventure is lost.  I&#039;m going to throw out a bit of trivia.  Did you know that many of today&#039;s women leaders in business and academics read Nancy Drew and loved the adventures?  In closing, in the U.S. and in many European countries, women have been expected to be perfect for years-from Donna Reed to today&#039;s teen girl idol.  It has not changed and in some respects there is less pressure to be perfect and less pressure to be beautiful, thin, and have money.  At least today girls are making their own money and not being pressured to marry into money or learn to be the perfect hostess so the husband gets to be a partner.   By the way, I knew executive women in the mid-80&#039;s who refused to learn how to use a computer.  They did not want to give up their secretaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up with the Beatles. Literally I was in 9th grade when Meet the Beatles hit the U.S.  These guys were really, really young when you look at them as were the Bad Boys, the Rolling Stones.  So regarding the Jonas Brothers, they may be young but so were the Beatles to many young American women.  Girls of all ages, not just tweens, teens and college girls LOVED and I mean LOVED the Beatles-everyone had a favorite Beatle.  The only women I ever met who did not care for them-ever and usually ever-were our mothers who are now 80 to 90 years old.  </p>
<p>So i don&#8217;t see the case for the Jonas Brothers-in fact one of them is &#8220;older&#8221;-</p>
<p>Regarding this year&#8217;s graduates with the job market-when I graduated from college I was one of the few graduates who had a job-the 70&#8242;s were not an easy time for people graduating from college between 1970 and actually 1979.  We were in Viet Nam and many of our male friends immediately went to the service after graduation from college.  Granted many of my friends got married-they did not have to look for a job then.  Myself-I decided to move to a ski resort as did many other college graduates that year and the next.  We had jobs and were introduced to more than alcohol or multiple partners.  </p>
<p>As females we were to be &#8220;thin&#8221; and beautiful.  This idea that the generation now is plagued with weight  issues and beauty.  Believe me, seldom did you ever see a girl between the age of 15 and 25 on a beach that did not have a hot body in the 70&#8242;s.  There was no such thing as an overweight girl and definitely nothing like I see today on the beaches.  </p>
<p>We dressed in very high heels, very short skirts and our mothers were beyond themselves as were our fathers.  We stopped wearing bras after Glamour came out with the pencil test.  We wore make-up and looked just like models out of Glamour along with carrying Chanel bags.  Many of us looked like we stepped right out of Glamour, Mademoiselle or &#8220;17&#8243;.  There were tons of &#8220;diet&#8221; pills and we learned from our male friends who were wrestlers how to &#8220;lose weight-&#8221;  By the way-this was in the mid-West in Oklahoma.  Consider what it was like in S.CA., N.CA and the East Coast.  </p>
<p>What I am getting to is this-life changes but not as much as you think.  What has changed and is a real problem, a higher percentage of students using drugs and not realizing &#8220;drugs kill&#8221;-we did not know that &#8216;Drugs kill&#8221;-we even had doctors giving us scripts for painkillers and did not realize booze and pills don&#8217;t mix until someone passed out from it.  Girls getting pregnant-nothing&#8217;s really changed.  It&#8217;s just more public now and many girls want to get pregnant.  What has changed is that Nancy Drew is no longer a book girls want to read and a sense of adventure is lost.  I&#8217;m going to throw out a bit of trivia.  Did you know that many of today&#8217;s women leaders in business and academics read Nancy Drew and loved the adventures?  In closing, in the U.S. and in many European countries, women have been expected to be perfect for years-from Donna Reed to today&#8217;s teen girl idol.  It has not changed and in some respects there is less pressure to be perfect and less pressure to be beautiful, thin, and have money.  At least today girls are making their own money and not being pressured to marry into money or learn to be the perfect hostess so the husband gets to be a partner.   By the way, I knew executive women in the mid-80&#8242;s who refused to learn how to use a computer.  They did not want to give up their secretaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen O</title>
		<link>http://www.ypulse.com/what-loving-the-jonas-brothers-says-about-gen-y-girls/comment-page-1#comment-4978</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypulse.com/?p=9716#comment-4978</guid>
		<description>I think the real issue is a lack of shows created for 20-somethings that showcase family values or &quot;clean fun.&quot; They just don&#039;t exist. If a show is for people who are old enough to have sex, sex MUST be integrated into it, those are basic media rules. Because of this, 20-somethings yearn for something that&#039;s just about goofy physical comedy - traditional sitcom territory, and the only place to find that nowadays is on the Disney channel/Nickelodeon. The shows aren&#039;t amazing, and the production quality is fairly low, but there it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real issue is a lack of shows created for 20-somethings that showcase family values or &#8220;clean fun.&#8221; They just don&#8217;t exist. If a show is for people who are old enough to have sex, sex MUST be integrated into it, those are basic media rules. Because of this, 20-somethings yearn for something that&#8217;s just about goofy physical comedy &#8211; traditional sitcom territory, and the only place to find that nowadays is on the Disney channel/Nickelodeon. The shows aren&#8217;t amazing, and the production quality is fairly low, but there it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rei</title>
		<link>http://www.ypulse.com/what-loving-the-jonas-brothers-says-about-gen-y-girls/comment-page-1#comment-4972</link>
		<dc:creator>Rei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypulse.com/?p=9716#comment-4972</guid>
		<description>I think this is an interesting theory and is probably true. After babysitting so many kids that watch Disney Channel all day, somewhere along the line I found myself watching it on my own at times. I&#039;m 24 and I love the Jonas Brothers as do a few of my friends. So much so that we&#039;re actually going to one of their concerts. I actually went to one of their concerts last year and noticed quite a few fans at the show that were around my age and even older so there are a number of fans that enjoy them enough to even buy concert tickets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is an interesting theory and is probably true. After babysitting so many kids that watch Disney Channel all day, somewhere along the line I found myself watching it on my own at times. I&#8217;m 24 and I love the Jonas Brothers as do a few of my friends. So much so that we&#8217;re actually going to one of their concerts. I actually went to one of their concerts last year and noticed quite a few fans at the show that were around my age and even older so there are a number of fans that enjoy them enough to even buy concert tickets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

